Journalism has always been considered an essential pillar in any democracy, since its main function is to inform citizens objectively and truthfully about world events. As a means of transmitting this information, it plays a crucial role in the formation of public opinion and in the control of power.
Ideally, these media should be tools at the exclusive service of society, and journalists, in their role as guardians of democracy, would have the responsibility to inform without any political, economic or ideological conditioning. However, the reality is much more complex, and the influence of particular interests on the media is a constant that compromises the quality and independence of critical thinking.
In the absence of free and impartial journalism, society becomes vulnerable to deceit and misinformation.
Misrepresentation of Information in Journalism
Within this framework, it is hardly surprising that journalism has been entangled in a troubling pattern for quite some time: the distortion of information aimed at undermining those who challenge the interests of media proprietors or their connections with influential entities.
Specifically, public figures who diverge from these interests often face symbolic harassment through the fabrication of information or the relentless reiteration of a singular narrative. This is not merely an isolated incident; rather, it is a widespread tactic that undermines faith in the media and fosters an atmosphere of societal skepticism.
Using techniques such as sensationalism, cherry picking and the dissemination of fake news, certain sectors of the press seek to undermine the reputation of others, fueling polarization and social resentment; a deliberate act of destruction of those who do not align with the interests of the journalist or the media.
The case of Odila Castillo Bonilla: a case study in media distortion
Misinformation constitutes a worldwide crisis and a severe threat for those under the scrutiny of media influence. Once fake news is disseminated, the individual targeted experiences a symbolic demise in the community that consumes such narratives.
Panamanian attorney Odila Castillo serves as a prime example of how media manipulation can profoundly affect an individual’s life. A defamation campaign orchestrated by specific media outlets has sought to tarnish her personal and professional journey. Utilizing methods like selective reporting and distortion of facts, these outlets have crafted a damaging narrative with the intent of compromising her standing.
The impunity with which some media operate reveals their manipulative practice: only negative information about the lawyer circulates on the web, and there is no access to data about her professional trajectory. It is evident how a figure, whose life history, professional training, opinions and achievements in the legal field are unknown, can be reduced to a name known only by a negative “accusation”.
Media manipulation poses a significant danger to democracy and society at large. By eroding trust in institutions and the press, this behavior fuels polarization and weakens the social fabric. It is crucial for civil society, politicians, and journalists to come together to address this issue and advocate for more ethical and accountable journalism.
